Events | Politics & Society | Religion & Culture | Arts | Sports | Travel & Living | Chai Tea | InFocus | InTune

Jhalak 2008

By Sumita Sami 19 November 2008 1,541 views 22 Comments

I was just congratulating myself on finding a seat in the first row behind the VIP section at Jhalak, when a tall individual flopped into the seat directly in front of me. I ended up watching the show at a forty-five degree angle, but despite all that, I enjoyed myself thoroughly.

Predictably for South Asian events, Jhalak began a little late, but my main gripe was with the singing of the national anthems. I thought that could have been handled a more professionally – definitely without a script, and maybe even with recordings. The MCs could have been also more subtle when reading off their scripts, but I have to say that overall, they did a great job.

In the spirit of celebrating all things Indian, the performances were organized by theme, with each group representing a particular festival. The evening began with Chandani, a student group focusing on the festival of Karva Chauth. Although they were enthusiastic and had a decent selection of songs, I didn’t think they made the best start to the show. But I have to say that Nritya Sangam, which came next, would have been hard to compare to anyway. An on-campus student organization focusing on classical dance forms, they were a huge hit with the audience as they performed traditional Bharathanatyam to exhilarating Latin inspired music.

The festival of Janmashtami had Sangita and Charanya singing an ode to Krishna, followed by an impressive attempt at Mere Dholna, which was unfortunately overwhelmed by the music. Still, it was clear the audience loved them. Professional dance group Agni was up next, and although I thought their performance had little to do with Janmashtami, it had variety and a great tempo. Most memorable, by far, was the Muqabala dance. That they carried off a song performed originally by dance guru Prabhu Deva, and with the inventive addition of painted on, glow-in-the-dark skeletons, made them a huge success.

Up next were the Roshogollaz, who were performing for the Durga Puja festival. Theirs were by far the most modern of the dances, and they were energetic and very talented. But what one of my friends pointed out was that not only did their performance have nothing to do with the theme, the background story (skipping out on a puja1 to go to a club) wasn’t exactly what anyone would showcase as part of Indian culture. On the other hand, their inclusion of non-South Asian performers was laudable, and garnered many rounds of applause from the audience.

Dirty South Dandiya, up next, was full of spirit, excellent costumes and co-ordination. Although they were performing a fairly traditional dance, the variety in movements and professionalism made them extremely lively and fun to watch.

The intermission was the best chance to try and grab some Bombay Bistro from the catering tables outside and catch up with friends. Looking around at the large crowd, I realized that if the ICA’s aim was to spread awareness about Indian culture to non-Indians, then they had certainly made some progress. There were a considerable number of non-Indians in the crowd, including a former professor of mine whom I had the chance to interview.

“Terrific,” enthused Yale N. Patt, Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, when I asked him how he liked the event so far. Interestingly, he mentioned that the dancing had been very unlike that which he’d seen so far, which had featured mainly women. Professor Patt himself has travelled to India several times in the past, and said that one of the things he loves about Indian culture is its variety: “Swimming in the Indian Ocean off Goa… it’s a very different experience from taking a train in Mumbai.” That love of variety would probably explain why Professor Patt enjoyed himself at Jhalak. He was also very enthusiastic about the MCs of the show, saying that “they played off each other very well.” Dr. Patt left soon after, however, regretting that his work wouldn’t let him stay longer. It made me wonder if the show, at four hours, was a bit too long – but if everyone was as enthusiastic as Dr. Patt, it would hardly have mattered.

Apurva Batra kicked off the second half of the show with a strong voice and good stage presence, but the sound again drowned out much of his voice. Ever-popular Texas Bhangra made up for that though – every formation, stunt and jump was in place and the music was amazingly energetic.

Of course, this wouldn’t have been an Indian cultural show if August 15th hadn’t been mentioned, so Independence Day was next on the list. Nino Kar’s soulful rendition of Vande Matharam was accompanied by a beautiful slide show; some of the audience actually leapt up to give him a standing ovation at the end. Mohini Dance Team, a student dance group on campus, was another crowd-pleaser. They started off with some semi-classical moves, but added in plenty of other modern styles that kept it all interesting.

So far quite a few of the performances had had very little to do with their theme, but I thought Nach Baliye made a conscious effort to introduce it at the end of an impressive mix of genres and some excellent dancing. Considering the fact that they weren’t a student dance group, much less a professional troupe, I and a few others were very surprised when they didn’t win best non-professional dance.

Crowd-favorite Hum A Capella made a guest appearance at the end, nicely rounding out an evening of excellent entertainment. I was particularly impressed by their Chaiyya Chaiyya, which relies on very strong vocals and rhythms; Hum A Capella took it and made it their own with great mellow voices and beats.

I’d never been to Jhalak before this, and I’m glad I finally did, because it was really enjoyable. I do think, however, that some things could be improved upon. I’m still not sure why it was made competitive; the prize giving was very low-key, and the judging criteria were never explained, which I thought important since both professional and amateur groups were present. The slide shows could certainly have been more professional, especially because they were hardly in sync with the narration and used a number of largely irrelevant images. Sound and lighting seemed a little uneven in places, and the end of the event, after four hours, dragged quite a bit.

Regardless of those problems, though, I thought the event was a big success, and I hope it continues well into the future. It was an excellent opportunity for on-campus groups to show off their talent, and for the audience to really appreciate the variety of Indian culture.

Click here to relive Jhalak through our exclusive slideshow!

Footnotes:
1. Prayer

Photo Courtesy: Araceli Jaime

Related Articles:


Email This Article
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

22 Comments »

  • neon said:

    Wish I could have made it to the event, heard a lot of good things about it.

    Nice review and I really liked the pics as well.

    [Reply]

  • VJ said:

    Haha … 45 degree angle for 4 hours !
    Pleasure reading this article!
    The pictures are particularly amazing.

    [Reply]

  • Nino Kar said:

    In order to be fair, I just want to mention that it was Texas Bhangra after Apurva, not Dirty South Dandya. It would be great if you could edit that part. Very well written btw.

    [Reply]

  • Sumita said:

    Thanks for the comments, everyone :)

    Nino, thank you for pointing that out! I’ve let the webmaster know and the change should be done very shortly.

    [Reply]

  • icis said:

    I cant handle so many disasters together…going to the event was a mistake, and reading this review was an even bigger one…the event pissed me off - its all politics, the winners weren’t deserving!!

    [Reply]

  • anish said:

    yo yo yo sumita
    good job :)

    [Reply]

  • papa said:

    I HAVEN’T READ THE ARTICLE BUT THIS IS WHAT I THINK ABOUT JHALAK
    1. STAGE LIGHTING WAS GOOD
    2. ACTS WERE VERY AVERAGE EXPECT FOR THE PROFESSIONAL DANCE GROUPS.
    3. VIDEOS SUCKED!
    4. BAD JUDGMENT BY THE JUDGES AS THE WINNERS WEREN’T DESERVING
    5. SOUND VOLUME/SETUP NEEDED TO BE BETTER
    6. AFTER PARTY SUCKED AS USUAL

    OVERALL, IT WAS JUST A GOOD GET TOGETHER OF THE INDIAN COMMUNITY

    [Reply]

  • Saheb said:

    I would appreciate it if you get your facts straight before you publish an article.

    For one, the professional groups were not supposed to be part of the whole theme idea. It was only meant for student groups.

    FYI, it’s DURGA PUJA. And it had only two ICA members. I don’t understand how you can take the liberty to call it ‘ICA’s own troop’, when the Vice-President was in Nach Baliye.

    Please call me and clean this article up.

    [Reply]

  • Sumita said:

    Saheb, thank you for pointing out the errors in my article. I’ve asked our webmaster to make the changes and they should be up by now.

    Regarding the professional groups: the judging criteria were not fully explained, so I believe that was an understandable confusion.

    I’m sincerely sorry about the inaccuracies and my assumptions, but they were made without any malicious intent.

    [Reply]

  • Kovid Gupta said:

    Sumita,

    THANK YOU for writing this. I really appreciate it. I AGREE that the judging criteria was not coherent, at least in reference to the non-professional dance groups.

    -Nach Baliye’s Director

    [Reply]

  • Amar said:

    The article is great, but I have an issue with a particular part:

    “The MCs could have been also more subtle when reading off their scripts, but I have to say that overall, they did a great job.”

    We didn’t have scripts. We didn’t read off scripts at all until the very end when we were thanking sponsors.

    I don’t think we could have done bhangra on stage and the other things we did while holding a script AND a mic.

    –Amar, your loving MC.

    [Reply]

  • Sumita said:

    Amar, thanks for the comment! I want to clarify that I didn’t mean you were reading off scripts all the time. What I was talking about was ONLY the very end, when you were explaining details about the judges, sponsors, etc. Apologies for the confusion!

    Actually it was the spontaneity and wit of your interactions that I thought were one of the best parts of the show. I don’t know how much you guys rehearsed (if at all), but it all sounded completely natural and professional, and I really enjoyed it.

    [Reply]

  • crazyppl said:

    wow! ppl get pissed so easily these days. its just a review for crying out loud! i guess the economy has hit us hard…quick…obama…SAVE US!

    [Reply]

  • Sonali said:

    Honestly, we’re not getting “pissed” it’s just that we want to voice the truth. I only read off of the paper when I named the judges because no one except for myself and two ICA board members knew the names and biographies of the judges. That itself was two long paragraphs and impossible to memorize considering that I was handed that an hour before the show started.

    But thanks otherwise!

    [Reply]

  • ANONYMOUS said:

    However, its quite visible that members simply do not take well to criticism in any form. I personally felt that this review was great - a very positive one in fact - the dances were great - the singers were great and shes said it in this article! i mean what are people expecting a list of 100 compliments? and instead of asking for clarification for each criticism people can acknowledge them in a slightly better fashion - and look at all the good things this author said.the judging criteria was NOT explained. and even if the MCs read off the script one small time, the author clearly stated how she thought they did a fantastic job - and how her PROFESSOR thought they did a great job. “call me and clean this article up” - if this was any other newspaper.. would you be telling the author to call u? that shows a lack of respect for the author and poor spirit.
    the event by itself, though pretty enjoyable, was quite a stereotype of what India is, and pretty much perfected the obsession with bollywood. the slides on that slide show were like constant random images of bollywood movies with shah rukh khan and the christmas one had non stop santa images. so yes there are criticisms that people make - especially when people arent writing an objective description but a subjective view.

    [Reply]

  • Anonymous said:

    The Durga pooja act displayed the bengali tradition splendidly for a whole 2 seconds. The video had sanjay dutt dancing with pots,the act had the crew dancing,the guy asking the girl out and of-course ” HEY BABY”,,,
    and you actually expect them to write that the show was not a direct derivation from bollywood???????????
    Seriously, its not a bad thing , its fine to have a theme and it does add little information to the show, but when someone says that it was a direct derivation from bollywood, the least you can do is accept it . And surprising enough,,, people say PLEASE CALL ME TO CLEAN THIS ARTICLE UP,, wow, have some respect for the publisher , the least you can do is call them up and point out the mistakes, moreover if you were sure about the quality of your show,, then should this review even affect you???????????????

    [Reply]

  • papa said:

    “PLEASE CALL ME TO CLEAN THIS ARTICLE UP” I totally agree with the person above me, one should have some courtesy and should know what to write in a public forum. You cannot just order people to do things for you.

    PLEASE CALL ME TO CLEAN THIS ARTICLE UP…haha…..dude….pls come back on earth.

    [Reply]

  • mama said:

    hahahaha…the last three comments are outrageously hilarious!

    when someone said “Please call me and clean this article up”, it was directed only to the “inaccuracies” of the article, and not towards the fact that the article had negatives or criticisms in it. There was no mention at all that he was pissed or anything about the review. He was just pointing out some misunderstandings on the part of the author. We all know he’s friends with Sumi and was on Nazar’s exec board, and hence it was probably on a total casual level! Now that you know this, read the sentence again “Please call me (Sumi) and clean the article (of the mistakes)”. These were serious errors and the author acknowledged the mistakes and ‘cleaned’ them up after reading the comment!

    It’s funny how people blow things out of proportion…you almost feel that it’s Nazar’s own members trying to shift the focus to cover their faults…who else would take the time out to write such massive and descriptive replies? this website sucks and we all know that. This is a great opportunity for them to increase their views. And guess what, it’s working! Cuz I’m wasting my time right now. But it’s important to clean the air, right?

    this website is a complete scam! why do you guys even bother?

    [Reply]

    Vaibhav Reply:

    @ mama

    Firstly, just because you are able to fill in a few blanks does not mean that every person who reads Saheb’s comment can do the same.

    Then, you may argue that we should remove such comments but that isn’t happening since Nazar is not a propagandist institution.

    Then, you might say that people are getting a wrong picture. For that, Nazar is glad that people like you clarify what needs to be clarified.

    But thereon, you make baseless allegations. By doing so, you are indulging in needless double standards. Also, you’re trying to hurt a young organization. I hope that counts as cheap in your dictionary as well.

    In all fairness, I am a member of Nazar and I’m not being ‘Anonymous’.

    [Reply]

  • kid said:

    papa & mama…pls find a room…no fighting in public!

    [Reply]

  • Arvind said:

    Hi guys,

    I would like to clear it up once and for all that the comments above are in no way endorsed by Nazar. There were a few minor errors in the article and those have been cleared up by the writer and that’s where Nazar’s involvement ends.

    Regards,
    Arvind Chandrababu
    President

    [Reply]

  • Aditya said:

    Jhalak has always been a haphazard amateurish show of Indian culture..back from the early 2000s

    It’s just that now, there’s someone writing a review on it.

    Clearly the ICA is not capable of bearing any criticism, creative or otherwise, as understood from Mr. Saheb’s reply.

    As for the competencies of Nazar authors, if one is unapproving of the quality of writings, one is free to comment on the article. Just like it is unfair for ICA members to bullshit the article, it would be unfair for Nazar authors to bullshit comments.

    So let’s hear everyone out, respect their opinions, and remember the four rules of posting comments: Be nice, keep it clean, stay on topic and no spam.

    Cheers.

    [Reply]

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled website. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.